
PwC Consulting cases are practical, data-driven, and often tied to deals, technology, and risk. Work through a full PwC-style deal case step by step, check your math as you go, and compare your answers to a model response.
On this page
PwC Consulting spans management consulting, technology, risk, and deals work, and its cases reflect that range. You are as likely to get a question about whether an acquisition will pay off or how to manage a new risk as a classic profitability case.
Interview formats vary by office and team. Candidates report live cases, written cases, group exercises, and recorded video cases, so confirm your format with your recruiter.
Many candidates describe PwC Consulting cases as interviewer-guided: the interviewer hands you data and asks specific questions. You still need a clear structure and should explain your thinking at every step.
PwC says its cases are built around real-world themes, from technology disruption to growth strategy. Expect practical problems over abstract strategy puzzles.
Behavioral questions sit alongside every case, and a weak fit answer can cost you even after a strong case.
PwC publishes its own case prep page with sample cases, including a risk management case and a healthcare acquisition case: PwC case interview prep. If you are applying to Strategy&, PwC's strategy arm, expect harder, candidate-led cases. See the Strategy& interview guide.
These five themes cover most PwC Consulting cases. Each example prompt below is an original PwC-style prompt, not a real interview question. Pick a tab to see how you would structure it and what math to expect.
This is an original deal case written in the style PwC Consulting candidates describe: a synergy exhibit, risk-adjusted math, a value check against the price, and an integration plan. Each step shows the question an interviewer would likely ask next so you can check yourself.
Answer each step out loud or on paper before you reveal the model answer. The suggested times match a strong candidate's pace.
Your client is Brightline Logistics, a US freight and delivery company with $2 billion in revenue. It has agreed to buy Corvus Freight, a regional competitor with $500 million in revenue, for $750 million. The bankers' deck promises $60 million a year in synergies. Before the deal closes, Brightline's board has asked PwC whether the deal will create value and what the integration should focus on.
Take about 2 minutes
Interviewer: How would you approach the board's question?
The deal creates value only if what Brightline gains is worth more than the premium it paid. I would look at four areas:
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: Here are the bankers' synergy estimates. How long does the full synergy program take to pay back its one-time cost?
| Synergy | Annual benefit ($M) | One-time cost ($M) |
|---|---|---|
| Depot consolidation | 24 | 30 |
| Fuel and fleet purchasing | 18 | 2 |
| Back office (finance, HR, IT) | 12 | 18 |
| Cross-selling (profit) | 6 | 5 |
| Total | 60 | 55 |
One-time costs total $55M against $60M in annual benefits, so payback is about 0.9 years, or 11 months.
By line, purchasing pays back almost immediately, while depot consolidation and back office take over a year. The bigger issue is what the exhibit does not show: these are the bankers' estimates, and they assume every synergy is fully captured. Cross-selling in particular is a revenue synergy, and those are much harder to deliver than cost savings.
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: In PwC's experience, deals like this capture about 80% of planned cost synergies but only 30% of revenue synergies. What are the risk-adjusted annual synergies?
Cost synergies: $24M plus $18M plus $12M is $54M, and 80% of that is $43.2M. Revenue synergies: 30% of $6M is $1.8M. Together, about $45M a year, a quarter below the bankers' $60M.
Take about 4 minutes
Interviewer: Using a 9 times multiple, is Brightline paying more for Corvus than the deal is worth?
Corvus on its own is worth $50M times 9, or $450M. At $750M, Brightline pays a $300M premium.
Risk-adjusted synergies of $45M a year are worth $45M times 9, or $405M. Subtract the $55M one-time cost for $350M. That is $50M more than the premium, so the deal creates value, but not by much.
The margin is thin. If cost synergy capture falls from 80% to 70%, the synergies are worth about $301M after one-time costs, roughly equal to the premium. The deal's value depends almost entirely on executing the integration well.
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: Given that, what should the integration focus on?
Take about 1 minute
Interviewer: The board chair asks for your bottom line. What do you say?
"The deal should create value, but the margin is thin. Corvus is worth about $450M on its own, so Brightline is paying a $300M premium. Realistic synergies of about $45M a year, not the $60M in the bankers' deck, are worth about $350M after one-time costs, leaving roughly $50M of value. That cushion disappears if cost synergy capture slips by ten points, so integration has to be run tightly. Lock in purchasing savings first, consolidate depots city by city, protect Corvus's largest customers and drivers, and track every synergy line monthly. The next step is validating the depot savings city by city before close."
PwC case math centers on deals, costs, and payback. Try these four without a calculator, and aim for under a minute each.
A company earns $30M in EBITDA, and similar companies sell for 8 times EBITDA. What is it worth?
A buyer pays $400M for a company worth $320M on its own. Synergies are worth $100M. How much value does the deal create?
A data breach has a 5% chance of happening each year and would cost $40M. What is the expected annual loss?
A new system costs $3M and saves $1.2M a year. What is the payback period?
Most PwC candidates face live cases, but some offices add other formats in the final round. Ask your recruiter which you will get.
You review a pack of materials, often with about an hour to prepare, then present your recommendation and discuss it with an interviewer. Decide your answer early, give each slide a clear takeaway as its title, and label your assumptions.
Some final rounds include a group exercise with other candidates. Interviewers watch how you contribute, build on others' ideas, and help the group reach an answer, not just whether you are right.
Some teams use a recorded format where you answer case questions on camera with a short prep window. Practice speaking in a clear structure, since there is no interviewer to steer you back on track.
The exhibit drills help with all three, since each one depends on pulling insights out of data quickly.
Learn to structure deal, technology, and risk cases, not just profitability. Start with the frameworks guide.
Drill math daily: valuation multiples, synergy sizing, expected loss, and payback.
Work through exhibits, and give the single most important takeaway first every time.
Run full cases with a partner, including PwC's own sample cases. Redo Brightline from memory and time yourself.
Prepare your behavioral stories and a specific "Why PwC?" that names the team you applied to. If your final round includes a written case, do one timed practice packet.
Premium unlocks the full case library with model answers, plus framework drills and exhibit drills for every part of the case.
See Premium plans Try a free BCG style casePwC Consulting cases are often interviewer-guided, with the interviewer sharing data and asking specific questions, though some interviewers expect you to drive. Strategy& cases are consistently candidate-led.
Expect practical cases on deals, technology, risk, growth, and operations. PwC says its cases are based on real-world themes, from technology disruption to strategic growth.
Yes. PwC's case interview prep page includes sample cases, such as a risk management road map and a healthcare acquisition. Work through them alongside the case on this page.
Some offices add a written case, a group exercise, or a recorded video case, usually in the final round. Confirm your format with your recruiter.
Strategy& is PwC's strategy arm. It recruits separately and runs harder, candidate-led cases closer to MBB. PwC Consulting cases are more practical and often more guided.
No. It is an original practice case written to match the style PwC Consulting candidates describe. All numbers are illustrative.
Case Prep is an independent practice platform and is not affiliated with, authorized by, or endorsed by PwC. The Brightline Logistics case, example prompts, and all data on this page are original teaching material.