Shelf Life
The CEO wants a clear point of view before the board meeting next week. Based on everything uncovered, what is your recommendation and where should Hartwell focus first?
Case Exhibit
Recommendation
Hartwell should prioritize reducing store labor costs through improved scheduling as the primary lever, while running a parallel workstream on COGS, as together these two areas account for the full 5-point margin decline and offer a realistic path back to double-digit margins within 12 to 18 months.
Evidence
- Store labor is the dominant driver of margin erosion, growing from 18% to 24% of revenue over three years while revenue stayed flat
- The scheduling math is compelling: a 20% reduction in hours per store recovers $24M annually, equal to 4 full margin points on $600M in revenue
- COGS has also drifted upward as a share of revenue, accounting for the remaining roughly 1 point of decline, and is addressable through supplier renegotiation or pricing discipline
Risks and Mitigations
- Reducing labor hours by 20% without careful scheduling design could hurt customer service levels and drive sales declines that offset the savings: mitigate by piloting in 10 to 15 stores first, using conversion rate and customer satisfaction scores as guardrails before rolling out network-wide
- COGS improvement may be limited if input cost inflation is driven by factors outside Hartwell's control: mitigate by separating inflation-driven increases from discounting-driven ones before committing to a target
Next Steps
Launch a store labor scheduling audit across a pilot group of 15 stores within 30 days. Simultaneously, commission a COGS deep dive with the merchandising and procurement teams. Bring findings back to the board in 60 days with a network-wide rollout plan and updated margin recovery target.
