
Strategy& cases are candidate-led and close to MBB in difficulty, and the fit interview carries unusual weight. Work through a full Strategy&-style portfolio case step by step, check your math as you go, and compare your answers to a model response.
On this page
Strategy&, formerly Booz & Company, is PwC's strategy consulting arm. It recruits separately from PwC Consulting, and its cases are harder and more strategic, closer to what you would see at MBB.
Strategy& is known for its capabilities-driven approach to strategy: companies win by focusing on the few things they do better than anyone else. Bringing that lens into a case, asking what the client is distinctively good at, sets you apart.
You set the structure, drive the analysis, and push to a recommendation. Expect market entry, profitability, M&A, and portfolio cases.
Prep guides estimate that behavioral fit makes up a large share of the overall evaluation at Strategy&, more than at most firms. A strong case can be undone by weak stories.
Strategy& and PwC Consulting interview differently. PwC Consulting cases are more practical and often more guided. If you are applying there, see the PwC case interview examples instead.
These five themes cover most Strategy& cases. Each example prompt below is an original Strategy&-style prompt, not a real interview question. Pick a tab to see how you would structure it and what math to expect.
This is an original case written in the style Strategy& candidates describe: a portfolio decision, a division exhibit, valuation math, and a capabilities question. In a live interview you would drive the structure yourself. Here, each step shows the question an interviewer would likely ask next.
Answer each step out loud or on paper before you reveal the model answer. The suggested times match a strong candidate's pace.
Your client is Verity Foods, a US packaged food company with $2 billion in revenue across four divisions. Its growth and margins have lagged its peers for several years, and investors are pushing for change. The new CEO wants to focus the company on fewer, stronger businesses. She has asked Strategy& which divisions to invest in, which to fix, and which to sell.
Take about 2 minutes
Interviewer: How would you approach this?
I would assess each division on three things, then sort it into invest, fix, or sell:
I would also check shared costs, since selling a division can leave overhead behind.
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: Here is Verity's performance by division. What share of total operating profit comes from Snacks, and what does the data tell you?
| Division | Revenue ($M) | Annual growth | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snacks | 800 | 6% | 15% |
| Frozen meals | 600 | 0% | 6% |
| Baby food | 300 | 8% | 12% |
| Canned vegetables | 300 | -3% | 4% |
| Total | 2,000 |
Operating profit by division: Snacks $120M, Frozen meals $36M, Baby food $36M, and Canned vegetables $12M, for $204M in total. Snacks is $120M of that, or about 59%.
The portfolio splits clearly. Snacks and Baby food are growing with healthy margins: invest. Frozen meals is large but flat with thin margins: fix. Canned vegetables is shrinking with the lowest margin, and it is a commodity business where brand matters little: a clear candidate to sell.
Take about 2 minutes
Interviewer: Buyers would pay about 8 times operating profit for Canned vegetables. What would Verity raise by selling it?
Canned vegetables earns $12M a year. At 8 times, Verity would raise about $96M.
That cash could fund growth in Snacks and Baby food. One caution: if the division shares plants and sales teams with others, Verity must cut those shared costs too, or its remaining margins will fall.
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: Suppose Verity sells Canned vegetables and lifts the Frozen meals margin from 6% to 10%. What would the company's overall operating margin be?
Revenue falls to $1,700M without Canned vegetables. Operating profit becomes Snacks $120M, Frozen meals $60M at 10%, and Baby food $36M, for $216M. The margin is $216M divided by $1,700M, about 12.7%, up from 10.2% today.
Verity would be smaller but more profitable, with a higher share of its business in growing categories.
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: To win in Snacks and Baby food, what capabilities does Verity need, and how should it build them?
Take about 1 minute
Interviewer: The CEO asks for your recommendation. What do you say?
"Verity should focus on Snacks and Baby food, fix Frozen meals, and sell Canned vegetables. Snacks and Baby food are growing 6 to 8% a year with strong margins and depend on Verity's real strength, building brands. Canned vegetables is shrinking, earns a 4% margin, and could sell for about $96M. Selling it and lifting Frozen meals to a 10% margin raises Verity's overall margin from about 10% to nearly 13%. The proceeds should fund innovation and online sales capabilities in the two growth divisions. The main risk is shared costs left behind after the sale, so the next step is mapping which plants and teams each division uses."
Strategy& cases move quickly between margins, growth, and valuation. Try these four without a calculator, and aim for under a minute each.
A division earns $30M of operating profit on $250M of revenue. What is its margin?
A business earns $15M a year and sells for 9 times earnings. What is it worth?
Revenue of $800M grows 6% a year. Roughly what is it after two years?
A company cuts 5% from a $400M cost base. How much does it save?
Strategy& puts unusual weight on behavioral fit, so a strong case alone may not be enough. Prepare four to six stories with clear results, and be ready for detailed follow-up questions. Have a specific answer to why Strategy& rather than PwC Consulting or an MBB firm, ideally tied to its capabilities-driven approach or a practice that interests you.
Some offices add a written case or group exercise, usually in the final round. In a written case, decide your answer early and give each slide one clear takeaway. In a group case, contribute early, build on others' ideas, and help the group reach a decision.
Many candidates also take PwC's online assessment before interviews, so check your invitation for the full sequence.
Practice structuring portfolio, M&A, and market entry cases, adding a capabilities lens to each. Start with the frameworks guide.
Drill math daily: margins, growth, and valuation multiples.
Work through exhibits with several business units, sorting each into invest, fix, or sell.
Run full candidate-led cases with a partner. Redo Verity Foods from memory and time yourself.
Spend real time on fit: polish your stories, practice follow-up questions, and sharpen your "Why Strategy&?"
Premium unlocks the full case library with model answers, plus framework drills and exhibit drills for every part of the case.
See Premium plans Try a free BCG style caseYes. You set the structure, drive the analysis, and push to a recommendation.
They are generally considered close to MBB in difficulty and harder than PwC Consulting cases.
Very. Prep guides estimate that behavioral fit makes up a large share of the evaluation, so prepare your stories as seriously as your cases.
It is the idea, closely associated with Strategy&, that companies win by focusing on a few distinctive capabilities they do better than anyone else and aligning the business around them.
Strategy& is PwC's strategy arm. It recruits separately and runs harder, candidate-led strategy cases, while PwC Consulting cases are more practical and often more guided.
No. It is an original practice case written to match the style Strategy& candidates describe. All numbers are illustrative.
Case Prep is an independent practice platform and is not affiliated with, authorized by, or endorsed by PwC or Strategy&. The Verity Foods case, example prompts, and all data on this page are original teaching material.