Not sure about subscribing? Every plan starts with a free 2-day trial—try it out, and cancel anytime before billing.
Learn more
Answered on: N/A. Time taken: N/A.
Retry question

Thin Spread

Case Interview Practice > 
Math

The team estimates that Cornerstone currently serves 120,000 retail customers who qualify for wealth management services based on investable assets. The bank currently has a 4% penetration rate on wealth management products. Peers average 18% penetration with similar customer bases. If Cornerstone could reach 12% penetration and the average annual fee per wealth management client is $2,500, how much incremental annual fee revenue would that generate? What would full peer parity at 18% represent?

Case Exhibit

Your Response
Whoops... look like you haven't answered this question yet.
Sample answer from an expert consultant

Rounding is standard practice in case interviews and almost always permitted with a quick ask.

Step 1: Calculate current wealth management clients

120,000 x 4% = 4,800 current wealth management clients

Step 2: Calculate clients at 12% penetration

120,000 x 12% = 14,400 clients. Incremental clients: 14,400 - 4,800 = 9,600 new clients

Step 3: Calculate incremental revenue at 12% penetration

9,600 x $2,500 = $24,000,000 in incremental annual fee revenue

Step 4: Calculate revenue at full peer parity of 18%

120,000 x 18% = 21,600 clients. Incremental vs. current: 21,600 - 4,800 = 16,800 new clients. 16,800 x $2,500 = $42,000,000 in incremental annual fee revenue

Rounded: ~$42M at full parity.

Step 5: Contextualize

Moving from 4% to 12% penetration, which is still well below peer average, generates $24M in new fee revenue annually. Full peer parity would represent $42M. For a bank with $18B in assets, this is a meaningful but achievable target. The more important question is what it costs to get there, whether through hiring wealth advisors, acquiring a wealth management firm, or partnering with an existing provider, and what timeline is realistic.

32-3