
EY Consulting cases focus on making change work: new technology, better processes, and lower cost without breaking the business. Work through a full EY-style transformation case step by step, check your math as you go, and compare your answers to a model response.
On this page
EY Consulting covers business consulting, technology, and risk work, and it is closer to implementation than pure strategy firms. Its cases reflect that. Instead of asking whether a client should enter a market, an EY case is more likely to ask whether a new system is worth the investment and how to roll it out without disrupting the business.
There is no single EY format. Each team sets its own process, and candidates report a mix of prerecorded video interviews, live interviews, case interviews, and written cases. Ask your recruiter exactly what to expect.
A good EY answer covers more than whether to act. It covers how: who is affected, what has to change in the process, and how to keep risk under control during the switch.
Expect process, cost, and technology questions grounded in how a real organization works, often in regulated industries like banking, insurance, healthcare, and the public sector.
Many EY interviews lean as much on your experiences as on the case. Prepare your stories with the same care you give to case practice.
EY Consulting and EY-Parthenon recruit separately and interview differently. EY-Parthenon is EY's strategy arm, and its cases are closer to MBB in style and difficulty. If you are applying there, see the EY-Parthenon case interview examples instead.
These five themes cover most EY Consulting cases. Each example prompt below is an original EY-style prompt, not a real interview question. Pick a tab to see how you would structure it and what math to expect.
This is an original case written in the style EY Consulting candidates describe: a technology investment, a process exhibit, a business case, and a rollout plan that has to work for the people using it. Interviewers differ on how much they guide you, so each step shows the question an interviewer would likely ask next.
Answer each step out loud or on paper before you reveal the model answer. The suggested times match a strong candidate's pace.
Your client is Lakeshore Mutual, a US auto insurer that handles 400,000 claims a year. Claims take an average of 21 days to settle, customer satisfaction is falling, and handling costs keep rising. Lakeshore is considering a new claims platform that would process simple claims automatically. The platform costs $30 million up front plus $4 million a year in licensing. The COO has asked EY whether Lakeshore should invest, and how to make the rollout succeed.
Take about 2 minutes
Interviewer: How would you approach this decision?
I would answer two questions in order: is the investment worth it, and can Lakeshore make it work?
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: Here is Lakeshore's claim mix. What share of total adjuster hours goes to simple claims, and what does that tell you?
| Claim type | Share of claims | Adjuster hours per claim |
|---|---|---|
| Simple (glass, minor damage) | 60% | 3 |
| Moderate (larger repairs) | 30% | 8 |
| Complex (injury, total loss) | 10% | 25 |
Per 100 claims: simple claims take 60 times 3, or 180 hours. Moderate take 30 times 8, or 240. Complex take 10 times 25, or 250. That is 670 hours in total, and simple claims are 180 of them, or about 27%.
Across 400,000 claims that is 2.68M adjuster hours a year, with 720K on simple claims. The takeaway: simple claims are 60% of volume but only about a quarter of the work. Complex claims, just 10% of volume, take the most hours. Automation helps, but it cannot touch most of the workload.
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: The vendor says the platform can fully automate 80% of simple claims. What are the net annual savings after licensing?
80% of the 720K simple-claim hours is 576K hours. At $50 per hour that is $28.8M a year. Subtract $4M in licensing for $24.8M in net annual savings.
576K hours is roughly 320 full-time adjusters. Those savings only become real if Lakeshore reduces hiring, lets attrition run, or moves adjusters onto complex claims, where faster handling also improves customer satisfaction.
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: Savings will not arrive all at once. Assume Lakeshore captures half the gross savings in year one and all of them from year two, while paying full licensing from day one. How long until the $30M investment pays back?
Year one: half of $28.8M is $14.4M, minus $4M in licensing, for $10.4M. That leaves $19.6M still to recover. Year two brings in $24.8M, so it takes $19.6M divided by $24.8M, or about 0.8 of year two. Payback is about 1.8 years.
That is a strong case, since most technology investments target payback within three years. Even if automation reaches only half the vendor's promise, the investment still pays back in under four years.
Take about 3 minutes
Interviewer: The last rollout failed because adjusters kept working the old way. How would you make this one stick?
Take about 1 minute
Interviewer: The COO just walked in. What do you recommend?
"Lakeshore should invest in the platform. Automating 80% of simple claims saves about $25M a year after licensing and pays back the $30M investment in under two years, and the case still holds if automation lands at half the vendor's estimate. The bigger risk is adoption, given the last rollout. I would start with glass claims in one region, involve adjusters in the design, retire the old workflow once the pilot works, and move freed capacity to complex claims to cut settlement times. Next steps are confirming the automation rate in a pilot and briefing regulators before launch."
EY case math is mostly about time, cost, and adoption: how many hours a process takes, what an error costs, and how fast an investment pays back. Try these four without a calculator, and aim for under a minute each.
A finance team processes 120,000 invoices a year at 15 minutes each. How many staff hours is that?
A bank has 2 million customers, and 35% use its app. How many more users does it need to reach 50%?
4% of 500,000 transactions a year contain errors, and each costs $60 to fix. What is the annual cost?
A $6M system saves $1.5M a year but costs $0.3M a year to run. What is the payback period?
For many EY Consulting roles, behavioral questions make up a large share of the process, and some teams start with a prerecorded video interview before any live conversation. Prep guides describe EY looking for strengths like adaptability, curiosity, collaboration, learning agility, resilience, and relationship building, so build stories that show those clearly.
The EY interview guide covers the rounds in more detail.
Some EY teams use a written case instead of, or alongside, a live case. You typically get a pack of materials, time to review it and build a few slides, and then present your findings to a panel and take questions. One candidate interviewing for a technology risk role described exactly this format on a PrepLounge forum thread.
The common mistake is spending too long reading. Decide on your answer early, build one slide per key point with the takeaway as the title, and clearly label anything you assumed rather than found in the materials. The exhibit drills help with pulling insights from dense data quickly.
Learn to structure business case and rollout questions. Start with the frameworks guide, and practice splitting implementation into people, process, technology, and risk.
Drill math daily: hours times cost, payback periods, and adoption targets. Keep the numbers small by working per 100 units, then scale up.
Work through exhibits, and give the single most important takeaway first every time.
Run full cases with a partner, including at least two technology or operations cases. Redo Lakeshore Mutual from memory and time yourself.
Prepare your behavioral stories and record yourself answering on video. If your team uses a written case, do one timed practice packet.
Premium unlocks the full case library with model answers, plus framework drills and exhibit drills for every part of the case.
See Premium plans Browse the case libraryMany teams do, but not all. Each EY service line sets its own process, which can include prerecorded video interviews, live behavioral interviews, case interviews, and written cases. Your recruiter can confirm which you will get.
Mostly practical cases about technology, processes, cost, and risk, often in regulated industries. Expect to weigh a business case and then explain how you would make the change work.
It depends on the interviewer and team. Some guide you closely through a set of questions, while others expect you to drive. Practice both styles.
EY-Parthenon is EY's strategy arm. It recruits separately, focuses more on strategy and deal work, and runs harder cases that are closer to MBB in style. EY Consulting cases are more focused on implementation and operations.
Some teams do. You review a pack of materials, build a short presentation, and present it to a panel. Ask your recruiter whether your team uses one.
No. It is an original practice case written to match the style EY Consulting candidates describe. All numbers are illustrative.
Case Prep is an independent practice platform and is not affiliated with, authorized by, or endorsed by EY. The Lakeshore Mutual case, example prompts, and all data on this page are original teaching material.